Our Cell Division lesson covered how at the end of mitosis an actomyosin
contractile ring assembles in location and with a timing dictated by the
anaphase spindle.
Actomyosin rings also form in other contexts, such as when a pocket of
cytoplasm buds off from a germline syncytium to form an oocyte.
Recently-graduated PhD student Jack Linehan from my lab (now doing a
postdoc at NCSU) measured the size and speed of different actomyosin rings, and
measured how the amount of ring proteins changed over time (were retained and compacted
or were shed off). He then applied these measurements to a mathematical model of
a ring made of contractile gel. The model could only fit the different experimental
measurements if we made one of the model parameters different for the different
kinds of rings.
That’s exciting because it makes a specific prediction about something
that might be different across nature’s variations on the theme of actomyosin
rings. We hope to make experimental measurements to test that prediction, soon.
Jack first posted
a preprint* and has now published, in Molecular Biology of the Cell, about variations on the theme of contractile ring closure. Anonymous
referees read our paper and submitted their opinions and recommendations to a
scientist who’s an editor for Molecular Biology of the Cell. The editor said if
we made the changes the referees suggested, he could probably accept it for
publication. We prepared our revisions, which the editor and one or two of the referees evaluated, and then the paper was accepted!
* pre-prints are manuscripts shared globally via the open repository
BioRxiv. "Open" means anyone can access the contents - they don't
have to pay $35 per paper they want to read, like for lots of for-profit
journals; their university library doesn't have to pay hundreds or thousands of
dollars for access to the repository like they have to for journals.
Pre-prints are not peer-reviewed. Peer review is the process by which 2, 3,
or 4 (or sometimes more) usually-anonymous "peers" (research faculty
at universities around the world) evaluate a manuscript according to the
standards of a the journal where they paper is being considered, and their own
experience and standards. They give a yes, no, or revisions required answer,
and usually many comments ranging from typos to perceived conceptual errors to
recommended extensions of the work. The journal editor summarizes all the
comments and tells the authors what they need to do to get accepted and
published. Sometimes they just reject the paper and the authors need to try
somewhere else.
Pre-prints can receive comments and suggestions, but people don't do that
very much yet. This could help prepare the manuscript for anonymous peer
review.
Peer-reviewed publication is still the gold standard for showing you've
advanced a field, but pre-prints allow the community to see what you've done
even before that long process is complete.